Public-record research · October 13, 2026

What the record shows.
And what it doesn’t.

A careful, source-led review of Katie Zacharia’s Pepperdine J.D., reported U.S. bar status, work in China, Zhong Lun affiliation, and role at Fix California.

This is a reconstructed report, not a verbatim export of the unavailable original Deep Research report.

At a glance

Six findings that frame the record

Each statement below is calibrated to the strength of the public evidence.

Confirmed

01

Pepperdine J.D.

Pepperdine identifies Zacharia as an undergraduate alumna from 2007 and a J.D. graduate from 2011.

Reported search

02

No admission record found

A published investigation says searches of all 50 states and D.C. found no public evidence of bar admission.

Unresolved

03

Bar-exam passage

Directory results do not establish whether she ever sat for or passed a U.S. bar examination.

Confirmed affiliation

04

Zhong Lun

Pepperdine repeatedly describes Zacharia as a former associate of the Beijing-based law firm.

Claimed, not confirmed

05

World Bank & IFC

The “outside counsel” description appears in bios and interviews, but no client confirmation was located.

Title confirmed · duties unclear

06

Fix California

Use of the general-counsel title is documented; the exact work and any legal authorization remain unresolved.

The essential distinction

A law degree is not a law license.

01

J.D.

An academic credential awarded by a law school.

02

Exam

A test result that does not itself complete admission.

03

Admission

Formal authorization by a jurisdiction after all requirements.

04

Active status

Present eligibility to practice, subject to maintenance rules.

“
The public record supports a careful conclusion: U.S. bar admission has not been publicly substantiated. It does not prove that no examination was ever taken or passed.

Method

Four evidence classes

  • Confirmed factPrimary institutional or government source
  • Reported findingNamed publication’s documented search or reporting
  • Claimed roleInterview, biography, profile, or promotional material
  • Unresolved issueEvidence is incomplete or competing descriptions remain

A living public record

Verification is the point.

Records change. Biographies are revised. Directory data can lag. Use the linked primary sources, check current licensing directories, and evaluate every conclusion against the underlying evidence.

Return to the top